essay · Startups

solving channel · where does your audience actually live?

The Distribution Chain, link 5 of 7. Where your audience actually lives, why your price point decides which channels are even possible, and a 30-day test for killing or keeping one.

This essay is part of the Solving Distribution chain framework. If you haven’t read the main pillar article, start there to see how Channel Selection sits between unit economics and scaled reach.

The Distribution Chain: Link 5 of 7

You have validated demand (Link 0), plugged the leak in the bucket (Link 1), sharpened the message (Link 2), guided sign-ups to the aha moment (Link 3), and proven that activated users convert into revenue (Link 4).

The engine works end to end. Now, and only now, does it make sense to ask the question most founders ask on day one: where do I go to find thousands of customers?

This is Link 5 of the Distribution Chain: Channel Selection.

The biggest mistake at this stage is channel spraying: running Meta ads, writing SEO articles, posting daily on LinkedIn, cold emailing CTOs and sponsoring podcasts, all at once. Spreading across five channels does not multiply your chances. It divides your attention and guarantees that every channel fails for lack of depth.

What Channel Selection Actually Answers

Channel selection is the search for product-channel fit. It answers two questions:

  • The Attention Habitat Question: where does your buyer already go to look for a solution, at the moment the pain is acute?
  • The Channel Math Question: can you acquire a paying customer there at a cost comfortably below what that customer is worth?

Great distribution rarely comes from mastering ten channels. It comes from mastering the one that fits your price point, your buyer and your buying motion.

A channel problem shows up as fragmented focus, burning cash, and an inability to say where your best customers came from.

Quantitative Signals

  • Acquisition cost above what a customer is worth: your cost per customer exceeds lifetime value, or takes longer than 12 months to pay back.
  • High channel volatility: one week a campaign yields 50 sign-ups, the next it yields 2 at triple the cost, with no explanation.
  • Unattributable blended spend: you spend €5,000 across platforms and generate €3,000 in new revenue, and because tracking is split five ways you cannot tell which part worked.

Qualitative Signals

  • Contextual mismatch: trying to sell a €50,000 enterprise compliance platform through TikTok ads, or a €10/month consumer app through outbound phone calls.
  • Platform resistance: your posts or outreach feel like an intrusion, and the audience reacts with irritation, because the tone of your offer violates the norms of the place.
  • Execution exhaustion: you spend 80% of the week feeding ad accounts, newsletters and podcasts, and have no time left to improve the product.

Why Channel Selection Breaks (Root Causes)

1. The Product-Channel Fit Mismatch

Products dictate channels. Founders do not get to pick channels by preference. As Brian Balfour puts it, you do not control the rules of a channel, the platform does. If your annual contract value is €100, you cannot afford a salesperson. If it is €50,000, you cannot rely on a consumer viral loop.

2. Premature Diversification

Founders mistake channel diversification for risk management. They see mature companies active everywhere and copy the surface. Those companies have a dedicated team per channel. Early-stage teams win by finding one and dominating it before adding a second.

3. Confusing Intent Channels with Discovery Channels

  • Intent channels (SEO, search ads, review sites): the user is actively searching for a solution right now.
  • Discovery channels (Meta, LinkedIn feed, X, podcasts): the user is browsing for entertainment, and you have to interrupt them and convince them they have a problem.

Run a discovery strategy on an intent channel, or the reverse, and performance collapses regardless of how good the creative is.

Which Channels Can You Even Afford?

Your contract value and your buyer’s intent narrow the field before you test anything:

What does one customer pay you per year?
When the pain hits, does your buyer go looking for a fix?

Test these first

    These will wreck your economics

      Tactic 1: Filter by Contract Value Before You Filter by Taste

      Match what a customer pays you to the channels those economics can support:

      • [ Over €10k/yr ] Outbound sales, account-based marketing, field events.
      • [ €1k to €10k/yr ] Performance marketing, paid search, specialised content and SEO.
      • [ Under €1k/yr ] Organic search, product-led loops, marketplaces, affiliates.

      Two rules fall out of that. If your contract value is low, you need channels that run without human labour in the loop. If it is high, you can afford high-friction, high-touch channels, and you probably need them.

      Tactic 2: Run the 30-Day Channel Isolation Test

      Instead of testing three channels badly over six months, test one channel intensely for 30 days.

      1. Pick one candidate. The channel where your buyer’s intent or concentration is highest.
      2. Set a minimum viable budget. A fixed number, say €1,500 of spend or 20 hours of focused outreach.
      3. Define the pass mark before you start. For example: 10 activated users at a cost under €50 each.
      4. Kill or keep. If the economics still fail after honest iteration on targeting and creative, write down what you learned, kill it, and move to the next candidate.

      Deciding the pass mark in advance is the part people skip, and it is the part that stops a dying channel from surviving on hope.

      Tactic 3: Speak the Platform’s Native Language

      Every channel has its own culture and format. Translating your message (Link 2) into that native form is most of the work:

      • LinkedIn: case studies, founder lessons, industry data, carousels.
      • Developer communities: open-source tools, technical post-mortems, live demos, zero marketing gloss.
      • YouTube and search: deep tutorials that answer an explicit “how do I fix X” query.
      • Cold email: four sentences, one specific operational friction, one easy question.

      Real-World Example: How Ahrefs and Vanta Picked One Channel

      Ahrefs sells SEO software. In their growth phase they ran no meaningful paid ads and built no outbound team. They noticed their buyers, marketers and site owners, spent hours searching YouTube and Google for actionable tutorials. So they put nearly all their acquisition energy into high-depth video tutorials that solved a specific problem using Ahrefs. That single channel carried them past nine figures of recurring revenue without a traditional sales team.

      Vanta sells automated compliance, with high contract values and a complex buying process. Consumer ads and viral loops were never going to work. They leaned on founder-led outbound, the Y Combinator network and targeted B2B events, matching a high contract value to high-touch acquisition.

      Different answers, same method: find where the buyer already is, then check whether the math survives.

      The Takeaway: Depth Beats Breadth

      You do not need a multi-channel media operation to build a large software business. Almost every company you admire scaled to its first meaningful revenue on one primary channel. Facebook had college campuses. Airbnb had Craigslist. Dropbox had a referral loop. HubSpot had inbound content.

      Fix Link 5 first:

      • Map your contract value to the channels its economics can support.
      • Test candidates one at a time, with a kill criterion written down in advance.
      • Adapt the message to the native form of the platform.

      Once one channel delivers paying customers profitably and predictably, you have earned Link 6: Reach.

      the newsletter

      Get the next one in your inbox

      Essays on building, craft, and staying in the game. One email when I publish something worth your time, and nothing in between.

      Free, on Substack. Unsubscribe whenever, no hard feelings.